4.1The Countability Axioms
Chapter (PDF)Suppose is a topological space. We say some admits a countable basis at if there exists some countable collection of open neighborhoods of such that, for every open neighborhood of , contains some element of . If all points in satisfy this property, we say that satisfies the first-countability axiom, or is first-countable.
Suppose is a metrizable topological space. For any , consider the collection of open neighborhoods about such that . Then, for any basic open neighborhood about , we have that there is some such that , and so , making a countable basis. Thus is first-countable.
First countability is a property that lets convergent sequences probe limit points and the continuity of functions.
Let be a topological space.
Suppose . If is a convergent sequence such that , then . The converse is true if is first-countable.
If is a continuous function, then for any , we have that . The converse is true if is first-countable.
: This follows immediately by the definition of convergence of a sequence in a topological space.
: Suppose . Note admits some countable basis . We can make a new countable basis from this, say such that . Of course, each is open and , so each is an open neighborhood of . Since , every open neighborhood of intersects . Thus, for each , note that is an open neighborhood of , so we are justified in choosing such that . If is countably infinite, then is a sequence such that , obviously. If is finite, let . There exists some such that, for any open neighborhood of , we have that , with the first inclusion due to defining a nested countable basis at . Upgrade the list to the sequence , and note that .
: Suppose is continuous, and let be a sequence such that . Let be some open neighborhood of , and by continuity of , there exists an open neighborhood of such that . Note that there is some such that for every , and since , we have that for every , and so .
: We show is continuous by showing that, for any , we have that . For any , note that there is some sequence such that by . By hypothesis, we have that , and we also have that from . Thus , and so is continuous.
If a topological space admits a countable basis for its topology, then we say satisfies the second-countability axiom, or is second countable.
Obviously, if is second-countable, then it is first-countable, since every open neighborhood of some can be written as the union of a subset of a countable basis from , and so admits a countable basis.
Note that admits a countable basis, where each element takes th eform for rational endpoints . Similarly, admits a countable basis where each element takes the form , where for every . Even in its product topology admits a countable basis, with each set taking the form for for each .
The uniform topology on is metrizable by the uniform metric , where ; hence, it is first-countable.
To show is not second-countable, we appeal to the lemma that if a space has a countable basis , then any discrete subspace is countable. Indeed, since each is open in , there is some open set such that . By the definition of a basis, there exists some with , yielding . For any distinct , the basis elements and are not equal since but (as ). The map is therefore an injection of into , proving must be countable.
Finally, consider the subspace comprising all sequences of s and s. This set is uncountable. However, for any distinct , they must differ in at least one coordinate, so . The subspace therefore inherits the discrete metric, giving it the discrete topology. By contrapositive, is not second-countable.
A subspace of first/second-countable spaces is first/second-countable. The countable product of first/second-countable spaces is first/second-countable.
The proof is entirely mechanical and a straightforward application of the definition.
A set is said to be dense if .
A space is said to be Lindelöf if every open cover of admits a countable subcover.
A space is said to be separable if there exists a dense subset of that is countable.
Suppose that is second-countable.
is Lindelöf.
is separable.
That is, second-countability implies being Lindelöf and separable.
Let be a countable basis for .
Let be a cover for . For each , there is some such that . Since is open, there is a basic, open neighborhood such that . Choose exactly one such that , and let . Then covers , forming a countable subcover from .
For each such that , choose some , and let be a set comprising each . Then note that for any basic open neighborhood about any , , and so . Thus is dense in .
Consider the set endowed with the lower limit topology, also known as the Sorgenfrey line. We will show that it is first-countable, separable, and Lindelöf, but not second-countable.
Of course, any admits a countable basis , so is first-countable. It is also easy to see that is dense in , and so is separable.
We show is not second-countable. Suppose is a basis for the lower limit topology. Then, for any , let be some basis element such that . For any , note that , since . Thus the map from to , defined by , is injective, and so , making the basis uncountable.
The proof of being Lindelöf is annoying.
Lindelöf-ness is not a property that is preserved under products. For example, even though is Lindelöf, we can quickly show (also known as , the Sorgenfrey plane) is not. Choose the basis that has sets of the form , and consider the set
which is essentially the graph of in . It is quick to show is closed, so we have that is open. Then consider the open cover formed by adjoined with open sets of the form . Every basis element (except the first) intersects , which is uncountable, and so there is no countable subcover. Thus is not Lindelöf.
The ordered square is compact (and thus Lindelöf), but the subspace is not Lindelöf.
A space is first-countable at a point (i.e., satisfies the first-countability axiom at ) if there exists a countable collection of open neighborhoods of such that, for any open neighborhood of , there is some for which .
From any countable basis at a point , one can derive a countable basis that is “nested” (i.e., ). Indeed, let . Then note is in each , and so is in each . Moreover, the finite intersection of open sets is open, so each is an open neighborhood of . Obviously forms a nested chain of open neighborhoods of .
First countability is a property that lets convergent sequences probe limit points and the continuity of functions. For a space and some , if we have a sequence such that , then by definition of convergence in a topological space. The converse is not necessarily true in a general topological space, but if is first-countable, then it is immediate (simply take a countable basis at any , make it nested, then choose a sequence as one would in a metric space).
Similarly, if is continuous, then for any such that , we have that (simply by the property that if is an open neighborhood of for continuous , there is some open neighborhood of such that ). The converse is only true in a first-countable space, however. Using the previous theorem about sequences, one can prove that .
A space is second-countable if it admits a countable basis.
A subset is dense if .
A space is Lindelöf if every open covering of admits a countable subcovering.
A space is separable if there exists a dense subset of that is countable.
Second-countability of a space implies the space being Lindelöf and separable. If is second-countable, it admits a countable basis . For any open covering of , note that for any , there is some such that . Since is open, there is a basis element such that . For all , choose this representative again when querying the cover for a member that contains an element. Associating with by , note that is an open subcover of , making Lindelöf. Furthermore, for each , choose some , and let be the countable set of all . For any , any basic open neighborhood intersects (since it contains elements from every basic, open set), and so , making separable as well.
4.1.1Exercises#
For a topological space , we say a subset is if can be written as the countable intersection of open sets. Show that singletons are space in first-countable, topological spaces.
Let be first-countable and , and suppose . Let be a countable basis about : we will show . Simply, if , then is in every open neighborhood of , making a limit point of . But is closed in a space, menaing it contains all its limit points, and so is forced to be , completing the proof.
Show every compact metrizable space has a countable basis.
For any , note the set of all balls of radius forms an open cover for , and by compactness we have a finite subcover . Then consider , a countable set of open balls that cover . To show is a basis, we show that for any open neighborhood of , there is some such that .
Since is open, there is some such that . Choose some such that . Since covers , there is some ball such that . Then note, for any , we have that
and so , completing the proof.
Show that if a separable space is metrizable, then it is second-countable.
Suppose has a countable subset , where is countable, such that . For each , let . Then note is a countable, open cover of —we show that forms a basis.
Let be some open neighborhood of , and let be such that . Since , any open neighborhood of intersects some . Let be such that , and also be such that . Thus , and so for any , we have that
and so .
Show that if a Lindelöf space is metrizable by a metric , then it is second-countable.
For each , let be the set of all open balls of radius , which forms an open cover for . Since is Lindelöf, there is a countable subcover . We conjecture that is a countable basis for the metric topology of . Of course, it is countable, and it covers . We now show it has the basis property.
Let be arbitrary, and let be any open neighborhood of . Since is open, there is some such that . Let be such that . Note that covers with balls of radius , and so there is some that is an open neighborhood for . Then, for any , note that
and so .
We have shown that, in metrizable spaces, being Lindelöf, separable, and second-countable are all equivalent.
Show that if is separable, then every collection of disjoint, open sets in is countable.
Let be a countable subset of such that (i.e., is dense in ). Let be a collection of disjoint, open sets in . Without loss of generality, suppose does not contain the empty set. Since each is an open neighborhood of some element of , there is some for which by the density of in . Since each is disjoint, the map from to given by is injective. Thus , making countable.