Altanis

4.3Normal Spaces

Updated 17 Aug 2026Chapter (PDF)

Normality isn't a super nice condition (recall that subspaces and products of normal spaces are not necessarily normal). However, many familiar classes of topological spaces are normal, and normality turns out to be an important condition for certain big theorems like Urysohn's lemma and Tietze's extension theorem.

[4.3.1]Theorem(Regular, Second-Countable Spaces are Normal)#

A regular, second-countable space is normal.

Proof.

Suppose XX is a regular, second-countable space. Then XX has a countable basis B\mathcal{B}. Let A,BA, B be any two closed subsets of XX. Since AA is closed, for any any xAx \in A, we may choose an open neighborhood UU of xx that is disjoint from BB. By regularity, we know there is a neighborhood VV of xx for which VU\bar{V} \subseteq U. Since VV is open, there is a basis element OBO \in \mathcal{B} such that xOVx \in O \subseteq V. Obviously, OB=\bar{O} \cap B = \emptyset, since OV\bar{O} \subseteq \bar{V}. Identify each point xx with some basis element as such, then let {Un}\{U_n\} be the collection of all of these basis elements (note this is a subset of the countable basis, and so it is countable). Applying the same procedure to BB, let the collection be {Vn}\{V_n\}.

Now note Un,Vn\bigcup U_n, \bigcup V_n are open sets containing A,BA, B, but they are not necessarily disjoint. Instead, let us construct two open covers that are disjoint. For each nn, define

Un=Uni=1nViVn=Vni=1nUi.U_n' = U_n \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^n \bar{V_i} \quad V_n' = V_n \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^n \bar{U_i}.

Note the finite union of compact spaces is compact, and as subspaces of a Hausdorff space, it is closed. Note each Un,VnU_n', V_n' is a complement of a closed set with respect to the open sets Un,VnU_n, V_n, so they are open. Moreover, for any xAx \in A, there is some nZ+n \in \bZ_+ where xUnx \in U_n and xVix \notin \bar{V_i} for each i{1,,n}i \in \{1, \dots, n\} (obviously, by Vi\bar{V_i} being disjoint from AA), and vice-versa holds for BB.

We have shown U=UnU' = \bigcup U_n' and V=VnV' = \bigcup V_n' are open sets containing AA and BB, and now we show they are disjoint. For the sake of contradiction, suppose xUVx \in U' \cap V', and so xUjVkx \in U_j' \cap V_k' for some j,kZ+j, k \in \bZ_+. If jkj \le k, then by definition of UjU_j', we have that xUjx \in U_j; by definition of VkV_k', we have that xUjx \notin \bar{U_j}, a contradiction.

[4.3.2]Theorem(Metrizable Spaces Are Normal)#

A metrizable space is normal.

Proof.

Let (X,d)(X, d) be a metric space, and let A,BXA, B \subseteq X be disjoint, closed sets. For each aAa \in A, there is some εa>0\epsilon_a > 0 such that B(a,εa)B=B(a, \epsilon_a) \cap B = \emptyset, since otherwise aa would be a limit point of BB, forcing aBa \in B by BB being closed. An analogous procedure can be used to find εb\epsilon_b for each bBb \in B. Finally, define

U=aAB(a,εa/2)andV=bBB(b,εb/2),U = \bigcup_{a \in A} B(a, \epsilon_a/2) \quad \text{and} \quad V = \bigcup_{b \in B} B(b, \epsilon_b/2),

with εa,εb\epsilon_a, \epsilon_b as chosen before. Obviously, UU and VV form open sets that contain AA and BB. We prove they are disjoint by contradiction. Suppose zUVz \in U \cap V, and so there exist aAa \in A and bBb \in B such that zB(a,εa/2)B(b,εb/2)z \in B(a, \epsilon_a/2) \cap B(b, \epsilon_b/2). Note that

d(a,b)d(a,z)+d(z,b)<(εa+εb)/2.d(a, b) \le d(a, z) + d(z, b) < (\epsilon_a + \epsilon_b)/2.

If εaεb\epsilon_a \le \epsilon_b, then d(a,b)<εbd(a, b) < \epsilon_b, and so aB(b,εb/2)a \in B(b, \epsilon_b/2). Vice-versa is true if εbεb\epsilon_b \ge \epsilon_b. But note the balls about points in BB are disjoint from AA by construction, and vice-versa for the balls constructed about points in AA. Thus we have reached a contradiction, and so UV=U \cap V = \emptyset, completing the proof.

[4.3.3]Theorem(Compact Hausdorff Spaces are Normal)#

A compact Hausdorff space is normal.

Proof.

Suppose XX is compact Hausdorff. We first show XX is regular. Let xx be any point in XX and BB be any disjoint, closed set. For any bBb \in B, we have the existence of open neighborhoods UbU_b and VbV_b of xx and bb that are disjoint. Note that {Vb}\{V_b\} is an open cover for BB from open sets of XX, and since BB is a closed subset of a compact space, there is a finite subcover {Vk}k=1n\{V_k\}_{k = 1}^n. Then U=bBUbU = \bigcup_{b \in B} U_b and V=k=1nVkV = \bigcap_{k = 1}^n V_k are disjoint, open sets containing xx and BB respectively. (Alternatively, note XX is compact Hausdorff and thus locally compact Hausdorff, then apply a previous theorem.)

For any two disjoint, closed sets A,BA, B, produce disjoint, open neighborhoods for each aAa \in A and BB. Intersect a finite subcover of the open neighborhoods covering BB, then note it is an open neighborhood disjoint from the open neighborhood about AA, which is the union of each open neigbhorhood about every aAa \in A.

[4.3.4]Theorem#

All well-ordered sets (totally ordered sets with the least upper bound property) are normal in their order topology.