Altanis

Cauchy Theorem and Its Applications

Updated 2 Aug 2026Chapter (PDF)

We have proven that if ff is continuous and admits a primitive FF on an open set Ω\Omega, then for any path γC\gamma \subseteq \bC that starts at ww and ends at w0w_0, we have that

γf(z)dz=F(w0)F(w).\int_\gamma f(z) \, \dd z = F(w_0) - F(w).

From this, we immediately have that if γ\gamma is a closed path, then the integral evaluates to 0.

This mirrors the fundamental theorem of calculus, with the exception that this doesn't apply to all continuous functions—the condition that ff admits a primitive is crucial. In real variables, a continuous function automatically admits a primitive/antiderivative, but this is not necessarily true in complex variables. For example, consider the function 1/z1/z that is entire on C\bC^*. For the unit circle γ\gamma, note that

γ1zdz=02πieiteitdt=2πi0,\int_\gamma \frac{1}{z} \, \dd z = \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{ie^{it}}{e^{it}} \, \dd t = 2\pi i \ne 0,

and so by contrapositive, 1/z1/z has no primitive on C\bC^* in spite of its holomorphicity.

Explicitly finding a primitive for a function is admittedly difficult. We alter our hypotheses to be more tractable, yielding Cauchy's theorem. It states that if ff is holomorphic on an open set Ω\Omega, then for any path γΩ\gamma \subseteq \Omega whose interior is also contained on Ω\Omega, we have that

γf(z)dz=0.\int_\gamma f(z) \, \dd z = 0.

We prove this for toy contours (i.e., for contours where the “interior” is intuitively obvious) and defer the proof of the full statement for simply closed (i.e., Jordan) curves to the future. We start by proving Goursat's theorem, which proves this statement for the case where γ\gamma is a triangle.

[2.0.1]Theorem(Goursat's Theorem)#

Suppose ff is holomorphic on an open set Ω\Omega. Let TΩT \subseteq \Omega be some path that traces out a triangle whose interior also lies in Ω\Omega. Then

Tf(z)dz=0.\int_T f(z) \, \dd z = 0.
Proof.

Let T(0)T^{(0)} be the triangle in question, whose orientation is fixed and considered “positive,” and let d(0),p(0)d^{(0)}, p^{(0)} represent the diameter and perimeter of these triangles respectively. Consider the midpoints of each side of T(0)T^{(0)} and connect each of them by a straight line, partitioning T(0)T^{(0)} into four triangles Tk(0)T_k^{(0)} for k=1,2,3,4k = 1, 2, 3, 4. We choose the direction of each triangle in the diagram shown in the next remark block.

Since the contours that aren't on the sides of T(0)T^{(0)} cancel out, we know that

T(0)f(z)dz=k=14Tk(0)f(z)dz.\int_{T^{(0)}} f(z) \, \dd z = \sum_{k = 1}^4 \int_{T_k^{(0)}} f(z) \, \dd z.

By the triangle inequality, there exists a k{1,2,3,4}k \in \{1, 2, 3, 4\} such that

T(0)f(z)dz4Tk(0)f(z)dz.\abs{\int_{T^{(0)}} f(z) \, \dd z} \le 4 \abs{\int_{T_k^{(0)}} f(z) \, \dd z}.

Let T(1)=Tk(0)T^{(1)} = T_k^{(0)}, and then let d(1),p(1)d^{(1)}, p^{(1)} be the diameter and perimeter for T(1)T^{(1)}. By geometry, we note that d(1)=d(0)/2d^{(1)} = d^{(0)}/2 and p(1)=p(0)/2p^{(1)} = p^{(0)}/2. We generate a sequence of triangles

T(0),T(1),,T(n),T^{(0)}, T^{(1)}, \dots, T^{(n)}, \dots

with the properties that

T(0)f(z)dz4nT(n)f(z)dz,d(n)=d(0)/2n,p(n)=p(0)/2n.\abs{\int_{T^{(0)}} f(z) \, \dd z} \le 4^n \abs{\int_{T^{(n)}} f(z) \, \dd z}, \quad d^{(n)} = d^{(0)}/2^n, \quad p^{(n)} = p^{(0)}/2^n.

Let T(k)=T(k)\mathcal{T}^{(k)} = \bar{T^{(k)}}, a closed and bounded (and thus compact) subspace of C\bC in its metric topology. Thus

T(0)T(1)\mathcal{T}^{(0)} \supseteq \mathcal{T}^{(1)} \supseteq \cdots

forms a chain of compact subsets. Then there is a z0kZ+T(k)z_0 \in \bigcap_{k \in \bZ_+} \mathcal{T}^{(k)}, and since ff is holomorphic on Ω\Omega, it is holomorphic at z0z_0. Thus write

f(z)=f(z0)+f(z0)(zz0)+ψ(z)(zz0),f(z) = f(z_0) + f'(z_0)(z - z_0) + \psi(z)(z - z_0),

where ψ(z)0\psi(z) \to 0 as zz0z \to z_0. Integrating both sides over T(n)T^{(n)}, for any nZ+n \in \bZ_+, yields

T(n)f(z)dz=f(z0)T(n)dz+f(z0)T(n)(zz0)dz+T(n)ψ(z)(zz0),\int_{T^{(n)}} f(z) \, \dd z = f(z_0) \int_{T^{(n)}} \dd z + f'(z_0) \int_{T^{(n)}} (z - z_0) \, \dd z + \int_{T^{(n)}} \psi(z)(z - z_0),

where the first two integrals vanish since the polynomials 11 and zz0z - z_0 are entire (and T(n)T^{(n)} is closed). So we are left with

T(n)f(z)dz=T(n)ψ(z)(zz0).\int_{T^{(n)}} f(z) \, \dd z = \int_{T^{(n)}} \psi(z)(z - z_0).

By the ML inequality, we have that

T(n)f(z)dzsupzT(n)ψ(z)(zz0)×p(n).\int_{T^{(n)}} f(z) \, \dd z \le \sup_{z \in T^{(n)}} |\psi(z)(z - z_0)| \times p^{(n)}.

Note that zz0d(n)|z - z_0| \le d^{(n)}, obviously, and so we have

T(n)f(z)dzεnd(n)p(n)=εnd(0)p(0)/4n,\int_{T^{(n)}} f(z) \, \dd z \le \epsilon_n d^{(n)} p^{(n)} = \epsilon_n d^{(0)} p^{(0)} / 4^n,

where εn=supzT(n)ψ(z)\epsilon_n = \sup_{z \in T^{(n)}} |\psi(z)|, and since zz0z \to z_0 as nn \to \infty, we have εn0\epsilon_n \to 0 as nn \to \infty. Finally, we have that

T(0)f(z)dz4nT(n)f(z)dzεnd(0)p(0)0,\abs{\int_{T^{(0)}} f(z) \, \dd z} \le 4^n \abs{\int_{T^{(n)}} f(z) \, \dd z} \le \epsilon_n d^{(0)}p^{(0)} \to 0,

and so Tf(z)dz=0\displaystyle \int_T f(z) \, \dd z = 0.

[2.0.2]Remark(Figure for Goursat's Theorem)#
[2.0.3]Corollary#

Suppose ff is holomorphic on an open set Ω\Omega. Let RΩR \subseteq \Omega be some path that traces out a rectangle whose interior also lies in Ω\Omega. Then

Rf(z)dz=0.\int_R f(z) \, \dd z = 0.
Proof.

Split the rectangle about the diagonal, yielding two triangles, and apply Goursat's theorem to each.