Altanis

0.1The Riemann Integral

Updated 2 Sep 2026Chapter (PDF)

This is not a section in Folland and content is drawn from a variety of places, such as Chapters 1-2 of MIRA.

We redefine the Riemann integral and basic results about it.

[0.1.1]Definition(Partition, Refinement of Partition)#

Let [a,b][a, b] be a closed interval in R\bR. A partition of the interval [a,b][a, b] is a list of finitely many numbers P=x0,,xnP = x_0, \dots, x_n such that

a=x0<x1<<xn1<xn=b.a = x_0 < x_1 < \dots < x_{n - 1} < x_n = b.

We say a partition PP' is a refinement of PP if PP' is a sublist of PP. That is, PP' contains all of PP and more.

We note that if P=x0,,xnP = x_0, \dots, x_n is a partition of [a,b][a, b], we have that

[a,b]=[x0,x1][xn1,xn].[a, b] = [x_0, x_1] \cup \cdots \cup [x_{n - 1}, x_n].

A refinement P=x0,x0.5,x1,,xn0.5,xnP' = x_0, x_{0.5}, x_1, \dots, x_{n - 0.5}, x_n would give a finer partition of [a,b][a, b] as such:

[a,b]=[x0,x0.5][xn0.5,xn].[a, b] = [x_0, x_{0.5}] \cup \cdots \cup [x_{n - 0.5}, x_n].
[0.1.2]Definition(Lower and Upper Riemann Sum)#

Suppose f:[a,b]Rf: [a, b] \to \bR is a bounded function together with a partition PP of [a,b][a, b]. We define the lower and upper Riemann sums of ff on [a,b][a, b] as such.

L(f,P,[a,b])=k=1n(xkxk1)inf[xk1,xk]f,L(f, P, [a, b]) = \sum_{k = 1}^n (x_k - x_{k - 1}) \inf_{[x_{k - 1}, x_k]} f,
U(f,P,[a,b])=k=1n(xkxk1)sup[xk1,xk]f.U(f, P, [a, b]) = \sum_{k = 1}^n (x_k - x_{k - 1}) \sup_{[x_{k - 1}, x_k]} f.
[0.1.3]Theorem(Lower Riemann Sums Smaller Than Upper Riemann Sums)#

Let f:[a,b]Rf: [a, b] \to \bR be any bounded function together with any two partitions P,PP, P' of [a,b][a, b]. Then

L(f,P,[a,b])U(f,P,[a,b]).L(f, P, [a, b]) \le U(f, P, [a, b]).
[0.1.4]Definition(Lower and Upper Riemann Integral)#

Suppose f:[a,b]Rf: [a, b] \to \bR is a bounded function. The lower Riemann integral and upper Riemann integral of ff are defined by

L(f,[a,b])=supPL(f,P,[a,b]),L(f, [a, b]) = \sup_P L(f, P, [a, b]),
U(f,[a,b])=infPU(f,P,[a,b]).U(f, [a, b]) = \inf_P U(f, P, [a, b]).

That is, the lower Riemann integral is the supremum of the lower Riemann sums over all possible partitions of [a,b][a, b]. Conversely, the upper Riemann integral is the infimum of the upper Riemann sums over all possible partitions of [a,b][a, b]. We take the supremum for the lower Riemann integral since the lower Riemann sums are always an underapproximation of the area under ff (and refining makes it more precise), so taking the supremum over all partitions gives us the best approximation for the area under ff. Vice-versa is also true.

[0.1.5]Theorem#

The lower Riemann integral is less than or equal to the upper Riemann integral.

[0.1.6]Definition(Riemann Integral)#

A bounded function f:[a,b]Rf: [a, b] \to \bR is said to be Riemann integrable if its lower Riemann integral equals its upper Riemann integral. We define it by

abf(x)dx=L(f,[a,b])=U(f,[a,b]).\int_a^b f(x) \, \dd x = L(f, [a, b]) = U(f, [a, b]).
[0.1.7]Theorem(Continuous Function is Riemann Integrable)#

Suppose f:[a,b]Rf: [a, b] \to \bR is continuous. Then it is Riemann integrable.

Proof.

Recall that a continuous map from a compact set [a,b][a, b] into R\bR is uniformly continuous. Let ε>0\epsilon > 0. Then there is some δ>0\delta > 0 such that

d(x1,x2)<δ    d(f(x1),f(x2))<ε.d(x_1, x_2) < \delta \implies d(f(x_1), f(x_2)) < \epsilon.

Let nZ+n \in \bZ_+ be defined such that (ba)/n<δ(b - a)/n < \delta, and form a partition P=x0,,xnP = x_0, \dots, x_n of [a,b][a, b] where xkxk1=(ba)/nx_k - x_{k - 1} = (b - a)/n. Then note

U(f,[a,b])L(f,[a,b])U(f,P,[a,b])L(f,P,[a,b])=bank=1n(sup[xk1,xk]finf[xk1,xk]f)(ba)ε.\begin{align*} U(f, [a, b]) - L(f, [a, b]) &\le U(f, P, [a, b]) - L(f, P, [a, b]) \\ &= \frac{b - a}{n} \sum_{k = 1}^n \left( \sup_{[x_{k - 1}, x_k]} f - \inf_{[x_{k - 1}, x_k]} f \right) \\ &\le (b - a) \epsilon. \end{align*}

Note that U(f,[a,b])L(f,[a,b])+(ba)εL(f,[a,b])U(f, [a, b]) \le L(f, [a, b]) + (b - a)\epsilon \le L(f, [a, b]). Since the lower Riemann integral is always less than or equal than the upper Riemann integral, the two integrals are forced to be equal.

[0.1.8]Theorem(ML Inequality)#

Suppose f:[a,b]Rf: [a, b] \to \bR is Riemann integrable. Then

(ba)inf[a,b]fabf(x)dx(ba)sup[a,b]f.(b - a) \inf_{[a, b]} f \le \int_a^b f(x) \, \dd x \le (b - a) \sup_{[a, b]} f.
Proof.

Let P=a,bP = a, b be the trivial partition. Then note

(ba)inf[a,b]f=L(f,P,[a,b])L(f,P,[a,b])=abf(x)dx.(b - a) \inf_{[a, b]} f = L(f, P, [a, b]) \le L(f, P, [a, b]) = \int_a^b f(x) \, \dd x.

The second inequality follows immediately.