We redefine the Riemann integral and basic results about it.
[0.1.1]Definition(Partition, Refinement of Partition)# Let [a,b] be a closed interval in R. A partition of the interval [a,b] is a list of finitely many numbers P=x0,…,xn such that
a=x0<x1<⋯<xn−1<xn=b. We say a partition P′ is a refinement of P if P′ is a sublist of P. That is, P′ contains all of P and more.
We note that if P=x0,…,xn is a partition of [a,b], we have that
[a,b]=[x0,x1]∪⋯∪[xn−1,xn]. A refinement P′=x0,x0.5,x1,…,xn−0.5,xn would give a finer partition of [a,b] as such:
[a,b]=[x0,x0.5]∪⋯∪[xn−0.5,xn]. [0.1.2]Definition(Lower and Upper Riemann Sum)# Suppose f:[a,b]→R is a bounded function together with a partition P of [a,b]. We define the lower and upper Riemann sums of f on [a,b] as such.
L(f,P,[a,b])=k=1∑n(xk−xk−1)[xk−1,xk]inff, U(f,P,[a,b])=k=1∑n(xk−xk−1)[xk−1,xk]supf. [0.1.3]Theorem(Lower Riemann Sums Smaller Than Upper Riemann Sums)# Let f:[a,b]→R be any bounded function together with any two partitions P,P′ of [a,b]. Then
L(f,P,[a,b])≤U(f,P,[a,b]). [0.1.4]Definition(Lower and Upper Riemann Integral)# Suppose f:[a,b]→R is a bounded function. The lower Riemann integral and upper Riemann integral of f are defined by
L(f,[a,b])=PsupL(f,P,[a,b]), U(f,[a,b])=PinfU(f,P,[a,b]). That is, the lower Riemann integral is the supremum of the lower Riemann sums over all possible partitions of [a,b]. Conversely, the upper Riemann integral is the infimum of the upper Riemann sums over all possible partitions of [a,b]. We take the supremum for the lower Riemann integral since the lower Riemann sums are always an underapproximation of the area under f (and refining makes it more precise), so taking the supremum over all partitions gives us the best approximation for the area under f. Vice-versa is also true.
The lower Riemann integral is less than or equal to the upper Riemann integral.
[0.1.6]Definition(Riemann Integral)# A bounded function f:[a,b]→R is said to be Riemann integrable if its lower Riemann integral equals its upper Riemann integral. We define it by
∫abf(x)dx=L(f,[a,b])=U(f,[a,b]). [0.1.7]Theorem(Continuous Function is Riemann Integrable)# Suppose f:[a,b]→R is continuous. Then it is Riemann integrable.
Proof. Recall that a continuous map from a compact set [a,b] into R is uniformly continuous. Let ε>0. Then there is some δ>0 such that
d(x1,x2)<δ⟹d(f(x1),f(x2))<ε. Let n∈Z+ be defined such that (b−a)/n<δ, and form a partition P=x0,…,xn of [a,b] where xk−xk−1=(b−a)/n. Then note
U(f,[a,b])−L(f,[a,b])≤U(f,P,[a,b])−L(f,P,[a,b])=nb−ak=1∑n([xk−1,xk]supf−[xk−1,xk]inff)≤(b−a)ε. Note that U(f,[a,b])≤L(f,[a,b])+(b−a)ε≤L(f,[a,b]). Since the lower Riemann integral is always less than or equal than the upper Riemann integral, the two integrals are forced to be equal. ❦
[0.1.8]Theorem(ML Inequality)# Suppose f:[a,b]→R is Riemann integrable. Then
(b−a)[a,b]inff≤∫abf(x)dx≤(b−a)[a,b]supf. Proof. Let P=a,b be the trivial partition. Then note
(b−a)[a,b]inff=L(f,P,[a,b])≤L(f,P,[a,b])=∫abf(x)dx. The second inequality follows immediately. ❦