Altanis

2.2Holomorphic Functions

Updated 24 Jun 2026Chapter (PDF)

[2.2.1]Definition(Holomorphic Function)#

We say a function f:ACf: A \to \bC, where ACA \subseteq \bC, is differentiable at some zLim(A)z \in \Lim(A) if

f(z)=limh0f(z+h)f(z)hf'(z) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(z + h) - f(z)}{h}

is defined. If ff' is defined at all interior points of AA, we say ff is holomorphic.

[2.2.2]Corollary(Holomorphicity implies Continuity)#

If f:ACf: A \to \bC, where ACA \subseteq \bC, is complex differentiable at some zAz \in A, then ff is continuous at zz.

Proof.

Note that limh0f(z+h)f(z)=limh0h×f(z+h)f(z)h=0×f(z)=0\displaystyle \lim_{h \to 0} f(z + h) - f(z) = \lim_{h \to 0} h \times \frac{f(z + h) - f(z)}{h} = 0 \times f'(z) = 0 from standard multivariate limit theory.

[2.2.3]Remark(Derivation of Cauchy-Riemann Equations)#

Recall that for a limit to exist in CR2\bC \cong \bR^2, limits along all paths must exist and be equal. Treating f:ACf: A \to \bC, where ACA \subseteq \bC, from this multivariate lens, we write f(z)=u(z)+iv(z)f(z) = u(z) + iv(z), as a vector function. For simplicity, let's say that (z)=x\Re(z) = x and (z)=y\Im(z) = y.

Leaving yy fixed and allowing xx to vary (traveling along R\bR), we have that

f(z)=limh0f(x+h)f(x)h=fx=ux+ivx.f'(z) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}.

Leaving xx fixed and allowing yy to vary (traveling along iRi\bR), and letting our step h=ikh = ik for kRk \in \bR, we have that

f(z)=limk0f(z+ik)f(z)ik=i(fy)=iuy+vy.f'(z) = \lim_{k \to 0} \frac{f(z + ik) - f(z)}{ik} = -i\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right) = -i \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}.

Letting these equal eachother, we arrive at the Cauchy-Riemann equations:

ux=vyuy=vx.\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} \qquad \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}.

The Cauchy-Riemann equations have major implications for holomorphic functions. For starters, f(z)f'(z) can be expressed in four distinct ways in terms of the partials of u,vu, v. Additionally, we can write f(z)|f'(z)| in a number of ways, with a very striking expression being

f(z)2=uxvyuyvx=(u,v)(x,y).|f'(z)|^2 = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial (u, v)}{\partial (x, y)}.

Thus the squared norm of the derivative of a holomorphic function is exactly its Jacobian when written out as a vector function. This has many geometric implications, leading to the interpretation of holomorphic functions as conformal maps, which we will visit later.

Eventually, we will show that being once complex-differentiable is the same as being infinitely complex-differentiable, and this will imply Clairaut's Theorem (that mixed partials are equal under nice conditions). From this and the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we obtain

Δu=2ux2+2uy2=0,\Delta u = \frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial y^{2}} = 0,
Δv=2vx2+2vy2=0.\Delta v = \frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} v}{\partial y^{2}} = 0.

A function uu that satisfies Laplace's equation Δu=0\Delta u = 0 is said to be harmonic. In the context of Cauchy-Riemann equations, the function vv is said to be conjugate harmonic to uu.

[2.2.4]Theorem(Criterion for Holomorphicity)#

A function f(z)=u(z)+iv(z)f(z) = u(z) + iv(z) is holomorphic if and only if u,vu, v have continuous, first-order partial derivatives that satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Proof.

():(\Longrightarrow): This is implied from taking the limit of the difference quotient along R\bR and iRi\bR.

():(\Longleftarrow): Suppose u,vu, v have continuous first-order partial derivatives that satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations. From multivariate theory, note that

u(x+h,y+k)u(x,y)=uxh+uyk+o1(h+ik),v(x+h,y+k)v(x,y)=vxh+vyk+o2(h+ik).\begin{align*} u(x + h, y + k) - u(x, y) &= u_x h + u_y k + o_1(h + ik),\\ v(x + h, y + k) - v ( x, y) &= v_x h + v_y k + o_2(h + ik). \end{align*}

Then note

f(z+[h+ik])f(z)=(ux+ivx)(h+ik)+[o1(h+ik)+io2(h+ik)],f(z + [h + ik]) - f(z) = (u_x + iv_x)(h + ik) + [o_1(h + ik) + i o_2(h + ik)],

meaning

f(z)=limh+ik0f(z+[h+ik])f(z)h+ik=ux+ivx.f'(z) = \lim_{h + ik \to 0} \frac{f(z + [h + ik]) - f(z)}{h + ik} = u_x + i v_x.